Team ID
19040
Cleveland Charge
Dynasty Era • Dynasty S1
Standings Tables
2
Roster
7
Scouting
ON
Context
Dynasty S1
Auto-conference detection couldn’t confirm this team inside the league table data. Showing all tables for this season so you can verify setup.
Team Scouting Report
Powered by GBA AI.
Team report needs standings context. Ensure the league table outputs W/L/PCT/PF/PA/DIFF columns.
Team Standings
All stats are for this season
Dynasty S1 (Western Conference)
Florida Mayhem
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF10
PF74
PA64
L10: 9-1
STRK: W9
FG% 67.16
3PT% 58.28
FT% 97.56
Dallas Red Raiders
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF5
PF70
PA65
L10: 7-3
STRK: W1
FG% 61.10
3PT% 50.81
FT% 95.00
Woodside Tigers
W17
L15
PCT0.531
DIFF-3
PF68
PA71
L10: 4-6
STRK: L1
FG% 64.84
3PT% 54.91
FT% 77.42
Northeast Mathletes
W14
L18
PCT0.438
DIFF3
PF65
PA62
L10: 6-4
STRK: L3
FG% 63.50
3PT% 51.48
FT% 93.75
New England No Limit
W14
L18
PCT0.438
DIFF-1
PF72
PA73
L10: 5-5
STRK: L3
FG% 68.11
3PT% 54.87
FT% 85.71
Tulsa Slaughter Squad
W9
L23
PCT0.281
DIFF-4
PF68
PA72
L10: 3-7
STRK: L5
FG% 63.40
3PT% 54.63
FT% 87.88
Toronto Black Jays
W6
L26
PCT0.188
DIFF-11
PF57
PA68
L10: 1-9
STRK: L1
FG% 59.40
3PT% 53.07
FT% 97.06
| Pos | Team | W | L | PCT | GB | L10 | STRK | PF | PA | DIFF | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | GP | Home | Road |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Mayhem | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 9-1 | W9 | 74 | 64 | 10 | 67.16 | 58.28 | 97.56 | 32 | 11-3 | 14-4 |
| 2 | Dallas Red Raiders | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 7-3 | W1 | 70 | 65 | 5 | 61.10 | 50.81 | 95.00 | 32 | 11-2 | 14-5 |
| 3 | Woodside Tigers | 17 | 15 | 0.531 | 8 | 4-6 | L1 | 68 | 71 | -3 | 64.84 | 54.91 | 77.42 | 32 | 9-6 | 8-9 |
| 4 | Northeast Mathletes | 14 | 18 | 0.438 | 11 | 6-4 | L3 | 65 | 62 | 3 | 63.50 | 51.48 | 93.75 | 32 | 4-10 | 10-8 |
| 5 | New England No Limit | 14 | 18 | 0.438 | 11 | 5-5 | L3 | 72 | 73 | -1 | 68.11 | 54.87 | 85.71 | 32 | 6-10 | 8-8 |
| 6 | Tulsa Slaughter Squad | 9 | 23 | 0.281 | 16 | 3-7 | L5 | 68 | 72 | -4 | 63.40 | 54.63 | 87.88 | 32 | 4-13 | 5-10 |
| 7 | Toronto Black Jays | 6 | 26 | 0.188 | 19 | 1-9 | L1 | 57 | 68 | -11 | 59.40 | 53.07 | 97.06 | 32 | 3-15 | 3-11 |
Dynasty S1 (Eastern Conference)
West Indian Oxtails
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF9
PF72
PA62
L10: 7-3
STRK: W4
FG% 63.60
3PT% 55.80
FT% 93.06
New York ThunderKatz
W20
L12
PCT0.625
DIFF6
PF74
PA68
L10: 9-1
STRK: W9
FG% 68.85
3PT% 61.76
FT% 89.29
Southeast Blaze
W19
L13
PCT0.594
DIFF3
PF65
PA62
L10: 8-2
STRK: W8
FG% 70.55
3PT% 60.91
FT% 95.00
Doseville Honey Compass Rx
W17
L15
PCT0.531
DIFF1
PF66
PA65
L10: 6-4
STRK: W1
FG% 63.80
3PT% 56.52
FT% 91.57
Tokyo Bushido
W15
L17
PCT0.469
DIFF-3
PF71
PA74
L10: 5-5
STRK: L2
FG% 66.24
3PT% 60.74
FT% 85.96
Angel Grove Power Rangers
W11
L21
PCT0.344
DIFF-5
PF58
PA63
L10: 1-9
STRK: W1
FG% 59.94
3PT% 53.16
FT% 79.55
Hartford Rampage
W7
L25
PCT0.219
DIFF-10
PF61
PA71
L10: 1-9
STRK: L8
FG% 62.86
3PT% 53.76
FT% 82.35
| Pos | Team | W | L | PCT | GB | L10 | STRK | PF | PA | DIFF | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | GP | Home | Road |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Indian Oxtails | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 7-3 | W4 | 72 | 62 | 9 | 63.60 | 55.80 | 93.06 | 32 | 11-6 | 14-1 |
| 2 | New York ThunderKatz | 20 | 12 | 0.625 | 5 | 9-1 | W9 | 74 | 68 | 6 | 68.85 | 61.76 | 89.29 | 32 | 11-8 | 9-4 |
| 3 | Southeast Blaze | 19 | 13 | 0.594 | 6 | 8-2 | W8 | 65 | 62 | 3 | 70.55 | 60.91 | 95.00 | 32 | 11-7 | 8-6 |
| 4 | Doseville Honey Compass Rx | 17 | 15 | 0.531 | 8 | 6-4 | W1 | 66 | 65 | 1 | 63.80 | 56.52 | 91.57 | 32 | 7-6 | 10-9 |
| 5 | Tokyo Bushido | 15 | 17 | 0.469 | 10 | 5-5 | L2 | 71 | 74 | -3 | 66.24 | 60.74 | 85.96 | 32 | 8-10 | 7-7 |
| 6 | Angel Grove Power Rangers | 11 | 21 | 0.344 | 14 | 1-9 | W1 | 58 | 63 | -5 | 59.94 | 53.16 | 79.55 | 32 | 7-8 | 4-13 |
| 7 | Hartford Rampage | 7 | 25 | 0.219 | 18 | 1-9 | L8 | 61 | 71 | -10 | 62.86 | 53.76 | 82.35 | 32 | 3-14 | 4-11 |
Roster (Scouting)
If a team is missing, please let Lynx know.
G1
PPG14.0
RPG3.0
APG2.0
EFF3
FG%38.462
3P%33.333
TOPG1.0
G3
PPG11.0
RPG5.3
APG2.3
EFF21
FG%51.852
3P%50.000
TOPG2.0
G3
PPG9.3
RPG4.3
APG2.3
EFF24
FG%70.588
3P%60.000
TOPG2.7
G3
PPG9.0
RPG7.0
APG2.3
EFF13
FG%38.710
3P%25.000
TOPG1.7
G0
PPG0
RPG0
APG0
EFF0
FG%0
3P%0
TOPG0
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
| Player | Role | G | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | EFF | FG% | 3P% | W% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
🪽 Wing | 1 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 38.462 | 33.333 | 0.0 |
|
|
🪽 Wing | 3 | 11.0 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 21 | 51.852 | 50.000 | 0.0 |
|
|
🪑 6th Man | 3 | 9.3 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 24 | 70.588 | 60.000 | 0.0 |
|
|
🗼 Center | 3 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 13 | 38.710 | 25.000 | 0.0 |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
If someone is missing, please let Lynx know.
Player Scouting Reports
Writeups are powered by GBA AI based on multiple factors, not just stats.
Good (What they bring)
- Protects possessions (1 TOPG)
- Disruptive hands (3 SPG)
- Can be the pressure-release valve late in clocks.
- Attacks closeouts and makes defenses pay for over-help.
Bad (How to attack)
- Efficiency swings (38.462% FG)
- Low total impact (3 EFF)
- Send a second defender on hard dribble pickups.
- Body them early—deny catch-and-go rhythm.
Ash_Nasty_ (G-League)
3G • 11 PPG • 5.3 RPG • 2.3 APG • 0.3 SPG • 0 BPG • 2 TOPG • 21 EFF
🪽 Wing🎯 Laser🎯 Spacer
Good (What they bring)
- Spacing threat (50% 3P)
- Three-level threat—can score without needing the ball nonstop.
- Fits any lineup: can slide up/down depending on matchups.
Bad (How to attack)
- Live with contested pull-ups instead of rim pressure.
- Top-lock shooters and force them into crowds.
Dottxe (G-League)
3G • 9.3 PPG • 4.3 RPG • 2.3 APG • 0.7 SPG • 0 BPG • 2.7 TOPG • 24 EFF
🪑 6th Man🪑 Impact Sub🪑 Bench Spark
Good (What they bring)
- Spacing threat (60% 3P)
- Efficient finisher (70.588% FG)
- Instant energy—changes pace and intensity when subbed in.
- Finds hidden value: extra rebounds, hustle plays, timely buckets.
Bad (How to attack)
- Keep the bench matchup advantage neutral—no easy runs.
- Don’t let them catch rhythm—early contest and force tough first looks.
Good (What they bring)
- Can punish switches with size if fed early.
- High-percentage offense: finishes lobs, dumps, and seals.
Bad (How to attack)
- Low scoring pressure (9 PPG)
- Opponents will help off (3P 25%)
- Efficiency swings (38.71% FG)
- Make them defend in transition—run after misses.
- Attack their conditioning with repeated actions.
FlockLewsing (G-League)
0G • 0 PPG • 0 RPG • 0 APG • 0 SPG • 0 BPG • 0 TOPG • 0 EFF
🎯 Point Guard🧊 Passenger
Good (What they bring)
- Protects possessions (0 TOPG)
- Manipulates help defenders—finds the corner or the dump-off.
- Can create separation to unlock drive-and-kick.
Bad (How to attack)
- Low scoring pressure (0 PPG)
- Guard role but low creation (0 APG)
- Opponents will help off (3P 0%)
- Efficiency swings (0% FG)
- Low total impact (0 EFF)
Good (What they bring)
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
- Comfortable in the two-man game; reads switches well.
Bad (How to attack)
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
- If you blitz the ball, force quick decisions and test the outlet pass.
Good (What they bring)
- Can create separation to unlock drive-and-kick.
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
Bad (How to attack)
- Go under screens if the pull-up 3 isn’t consistent.
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
