Team ID
19039
G League Ignite
Dynasty Era • Dynasty S1
Standings Tables
2
Roster
6
Scouting
ON
Context
Dynasty S1
Auto-conference detection couldn’t confirm this team inside the league table data. Showing all tables for this season so you can verify setup.
Team Scouting Report
Powered by GBA AI.
Team report needs standings context. Ensure the league table outputs W/L/PCT/PF/PA/DIFF columns.
Team Standings
All stats are for this season
Dynasty S1 (Western Conference)
Florida Mayhem
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF10
PF74
PA64
L10: 9-1
STRK: W9
FG% 67.16
3PT% 58.28
FT% 97.56
Dallas Red Raiders
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF5
PF70
PA65
L10: 7-3
STRK: W1
FG% 61.10
3PT% 50.81
FT% 95.00
Woodside Tigers
W17
L15
PCT0.531
DIFF-3
PF68
PA71
L10: 4-6
STRK: L1
FG% 64.84
3PT% 54.91
FT% 77.42
Northeast Mathletes
W14
L18
PCT0.438
DIFF3
PF65
PA62
L10: 6-4
STRK: L3
FG% 63.50
3PT% 51.48
FT% 93.75
New England No Limit
W14
L18
PCT0.438
DIFF-1
PF72
PA73
L10: 5-5
STRK: L3
FG% 68.11
3PT% 54.87
FT% 85.71
Tulsa Slaughter Squad
W9
L23
PCT0.281
DIFF-4
PF68
PA72
L10: 3-7
STRK: L5
FG% 63.40
3PT% 54.63
FT% 87.88
Toronto Black Jays
W6
L26
PCT0.188
DIFF-11
PF57
PA68
L10: 1-9
STRK: L1
FG% 59.40
3PT% 53.07
FT% 97.06
| Pos | Team | W | L | PCT | GB | L10 | STRK | PF | PA | DIFF | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | GP | Home | Road |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Mayhem | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 9-1 | W9 | 74 | 64 | 10 | 67.16 | 58.28 | 97.56 | 32 | 11-3 | 14-4 |
| 2 | Dallas Red Raiders | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 7-3 | W1 | 70 | 65 | 5 | 61.10 | 50.81 | 95.00 | 32 | 11-2 | 14-5 |
| 3 | Woodside Tigers | 17 | 15 | 0.531 | 8 | 4-6 | L1 | 68 | 71 | -3 | 64.84 | 54.91 | 77.42 | 32 | 9-6 | 8-9 |
| 4 | Northeast Mathletes | 14 | 18 | 0.438 | 11 | 6-4 | L3 | 65 | 62 | 3 | 63.50 | 51.48 | 93.75 | 32 | 4-10 | 10-8 |
| 5 | New England No Limit | 14 | 18 | 0.438 | 11 | 5-5 | L3 | 72 | 73 | -1 | 68.11 | 54.87 | 85.71 | 32 | 6-10 | 8-8 |
| 6 | Tulsa Slaughter Squad | 9 | 23 | 0.281 | 16 | 3-7 | L5 | 68 | 72 | -4 | 63.40 | 54.63 | 87.88 | 32 | 4-13 | 5-10 |
| 7 | Toronto Black Jays | 6 | 26 | 0.188 | 19 | 1-9 | L1 | 57 | 68 | -11 | 59.40 | 53.07 | 97.06 | 32 | 3-15 | 3-11 |
Dynasty S1 (Eastern Conference)
West Indian Oxtails
W25
L7
PCT0.781
DIFF9
PF72
PA62
L10: 7-3
STRK: W4
FG% 63.60
3PT% 55.80
FT% 93.06
New York ThunderKatz
W20
L12
PCT0.625
DIFF6
PF74
PA68
L10: 9-1
STRK: W9
FG% 68.85
3PT% 61.76
FT% 89.29
Southeast Blaze
W19
L13
PCT0.594
DIFF3
PF65
PA62
L10: 8-2
STRK: W8
FG% 70.55
3PT% 60.91
FT% 95.00
Doseville Honey Compass Rx
W17
L15
PCT0.531
DIFF1
PF66
PA65
L10: 6-4
STRK: W1
FG% 63.80
3PT% 56.52
FT% 91.57
Tokyo Bushido
W15
L17
PCT0.469
DIFF-3
PF71
PA74
L10: 5-5
STRK: L2
FG% 66.24
3PT% 60.74
FT% 85.96
Angel Grove Power Rangers
W11
L21
PCT0.344
DIFF-5
PF58
PA63
L10: 1-9
STRK: W1
FG% 59.94
3PT% 53.16
FT% 79.55
Hartford Rampage
W7
L25
PCT0.219
DIFF-10
PF61
PA71
L10: 1-9
STRK: L8
FG% 62.86
3PT% 53.76
FT% 82.35
| Pos | Team | W | L | PCT | GB | L10 | STRK | PF | PA | DIFF | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | GP | Home | Road |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Indian Oxtails | 25 | 7 | 0.781 | 0 | 7-3 | W4 | 72 | 62 | 9 | 63.60 | 55.80 | 93.06 | 32 | 11-6 | 14-1 |
| 2 | New York ThunderKatz | 20 | 12 | 0.625 | 5 | 9-1 | W9 | 74 | 68 | 6 | 68.85 | 61.76 | 89.29 | 32 | 11-8 | 9-4 |
| 3 | Southeast Blaze | 19 | 13 | 0.594 | 6 | 8-2 | W8 | 65 | 62 | 3 | 70.55 | 60.91 | 95.00 | 32 | 11-7 | 8-6 |
| 4 | Doseville Honey Compass Rx | 17 | 15 | 0.531 | 8 | 6-4 | W1 | 66 | 65 | 1 | 63.80 | 56.52 | 91.57 | 32 | 7-6 | 10-9 |
| 5 | Tokyo Bushido | 15 | 17 | 0.469 | 10 | 5-5 | L2 | 71 | 74 | -3 | 66.24 | 60.74 | 85.96 | 32 | 8-10 | 7-7 |
| 6 | Angel Grove Power Rangers | 11 | 21 | 0.344 | 14 | 1-9 | W1 | 58 | 63 | -5 | 59.94 | 53.16 | 79.55 | 32 | 7-8 | 4-13 |
| 7 | Hartford Rampage | 7 | 25 | 0.219 | 18 | 1-9 | L8 | 61 | 71 | -10 | 62.86 | 53.76 | 82.35 | 32 | 3-14 | 4-11 |
Roster (Scouting)
If a team is missing, please let Lynx know.
G8
PPG6.8
RPG2.6
APG1.5
EFF52
FG%53.191
3P%28.571
TOPG0.5
G0
PPG0
RPG0
APG0
EFF0
FG%0
3P%0
TOPG0
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
G—
PPG—
RPG—
APG—
EFF—
FG%—
3P%—
TOPG—
| Player | Role | G | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TOPG | EFF | FG% | 3P% | W% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
🪑 6th Man | 8 | 6.8 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 52 | 53.191 | 28.571 | 75.0 |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
🎯 Point Guard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
If someone is missing, please let Lynx know.
Player Scouting Reports
Writeups are powered by GBA AI based on multiple factors, not just stats.
ThatsGreenFN (G-League)
8G • 6.8 PPG • 2.6 RPG • 1.5 APG • 0.6 SPG • 0.4 BPG • 0.5 TOPG • 52 EFF
🪑 6th Man🪑 Impact Sub🪑 Bench Spark
Good (What they bring)
- Protects possessions (0.5 TOPG)
- High all-around impact (52 EFF)
- Comfortable doing the dirty work without needing touches.
- Bench stabilizer: keeps lineups functional when starters sit.
Bad (How to attack)
- Low scoring pressure (6.8 PPG)
- Opponents will help off (3P 28.571%)
- If they’re a defender, attack them with spacing and movement.
- Identify what they do well quickly, then take it away.
BankrollAnt (G-League)
0G • 0 PPG • 0 RPG • 0 APG • 0 SPG • 0 BPG • 0 TOPG • 0 EFF
🎯 Point Guard🧊 Passenger
Good (What they bring)
- Protects possessions (0 TOPG)
- Manipulates help defenders—finds the corner or the dump-off.
- Can create separation to unlock drive-and-kick.
Bad (How to attack)
- Low scoring pressure (0 PPG)
- Guard role but low creation (0 APG)
- Opponents will help off (3P 0%)
- Efficiency swings (0% FG)
- Low total impact (0 EFF)
Good (What they bring)
- Can create separation to unlock drive-and-kick.
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
Bad (How to attack)
- Go under screens if the pull-up 3 isn’t consistent.
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
Good (What they bring)
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
- Comfortable in the two-man game; reads switches well.
Bad (How to attack)
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
- If you blitz the ball, force quick decisions and test the outlet pass.
Good (What they bring)
- Can create separation to unlock drive-and-kick.
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
Bad (How to attack)
- Go under screens if the pull-up 3 isn’t consistent.
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
Good (What they bring)
- Controls tempo and gets the team organized.
- Comfortable in the two-man game; reads switches well.
Bad (How to attack)
- Make them finish over size—no freebies at the rim.
- If you blitz the ball, force quick decisions and test the outlet pass.
